A Comparative Analysis of Agile and Traditional Project Management Methodologies in Sporting Event Management

Abstract

Traditional and Agile project management methodologies represent distinct approaches to overseeing projects, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Traditional project management emphasizes detailed planning, predictability, and sequential execution, making it suitable for projects with clearly defined scopes and minimal uncertainty. In contrast, Agile project management prioritizes flexibility, collaboration, and iterative development, enabling rapid adaptation to changing requirements and customer feedback. This study conducts a comparative analysis of these methodologies, examining their applicability to sporting event management, where dynamic environments and evolving stakeholder expectations often necessitate adaptive strategies. The analysis encompasses various aspects, including flexibility and adaptability, project requirements, communication strategies, project phases and planning, and team functionality. Traditional project management relies on comprehensive documentation and formal communication, while Agile promotes face-to-face interaction and continuous feedback. The choice between these methodologies depends on the specific context of the sporting event, considering factors such as project size, clarity of requirements, and the degree of stakeholder involvement1. Agile methodologies have demonstrated a higher rate of project success compared to traditional methods, particularly in IT projects. By understanding the nuances of each approach, event managers can strategically select or integrate methodologies to optimize project outcomes and stakeholder satisfaction