MES-Enabled Cyber-Physical Production Systems: Accelerating Automotive Line Efficiency via Real-Time Decision Frameworks

Authors

  • Jay Hemantkumar Shah Webasto Convertibles (Manufacturing Engineer). Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-922X.IJERET-V4I2P109

Keywords:

Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS), Manufacturing Execution System (MES), Industry 4.0, Real-Time Decision-Making, Automotive Manufacturing

Abstract

The high pace of digitalization of the manufacturing process in the automotive sector creates the need to integrate modern technologies that foster efficient operations, minimize waste, and raise the level of market responsiveness. In combination with the Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS), the Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) provide a revolutionary path to an optimal production process flow in real-time. In this paper, the author will discuss the implementation and revealing analysis of MES-enabled CPPS through their application in enhancing efficiency in an automotive production line. The suggested real-time decision-making models have used machine data, context-based data, and predictive analysis to make dynamic planning of production processes. In contrast to traditional manufacturing systems, where latency and fragmentation in the decision cycle are in place, MES-integrated CPPS creates a closed-loop ecosystem, which offers smooth vertical and horizontal integration of shop floor and enterprise-level IT infrastructure. The paper provides a modular decision-making process concept in real time, proves the modelled concept with a case study in a medium-sized car assembly plant, and provides benchmarks of efficiency improvement. The reason the real-time decision logic can function is that it is sustained by edge-computing devices, integrated digital twins, and machine learning models that forecast bottlenecks and proactively adjust the workflow. We demonstrate that we can improve Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) by up to 23.5 per cent, reduce the Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) by 19.3 per cent, and make the production schedule more accurate by 28.7 per cent. Moreover, the study has identified interoperability standards, system architecture, and communication protocols that are critical to scalable deployment. These results are supported by a combination of simulation-empirical methodology, which utilises the Arena simulation program, and the integration of sensor-based data in real-life settings. The study stresses the potential of MES-enabled CPPS as a staple of Smart Manufacturing through Industry 4.0 and opens the path towards autonomous production through the automotive industry

References

[1] Lee, E. A. (2008, May). Cyber-physical systems: Design challenges. In 2008, 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC) (pp. 363-369). IEEE.

[2] Monostori, L. (2014). Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia cirp, 17, 9-13.

[3] Wang, L., Törngren, M., & Onori, M. (2015). Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Journal of manufacturing systems, 37, 517-527.

[4] Schlechtendahl, J., Keinert, M., Kretschmer, F., Lechler, A., & Verl, A. (2015). Making existing production systems Industry 4.0-ready: A Holistic approach to the integration of existing production systems in Industry 4.0 environments. Production Engineering, 9(1), 143-148.

[5] Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016, January). Design principles for Industry 4.0 scenarios. In 2016, the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3928-3937). IEEE.

[6] Hohl, P., Münch, J., Schneider, K., & Stupperich, M. (2017, October). Real-life challenges on agile software product lines in automotive. In International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (pp. 28-36). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[7] Radziwon, A., Bilberg, A., Bogers, M., & Madsen, E. S. (2014). The smart factory: exploring adaptive and flexible manufacturing solutions. Procedia engineering, 69, 1184-1190.

[8] Colombo, A. W., Bangemann, T., Karnouskos, S., Delsing, J., Stluka, P., Harrison, R., ... & Lastra, J. L. (2014). Industrial cloud-based cyber-physical systems. The Imc-aesop Approach, 22, 4-5.

[9] Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Implementing a Smart Factory of Industry 4.0: An Outlook. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12(1), 3159805.

[10] Thoben, K. D., Wiesner, S., & Wuest, T. (2017). “Industrie 4.0” and smart manufacturing: review of research issues and application examples. International journal of automation technology, 11(1), 4-16.

[11] Zuehlke, D. (2010). SmartFactoryTowards a factory-of-things. Annual reviews in control, 34(1), 129-138.

[12] Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., & Milas, N. J. P. C. (2016). Industrial big data is a result of the adoption of IoT in manufacturing. Procedia cirp, 55, 290-295.

[13] Kang, H. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, S., Kim, H., Park, J. H., Son, J. Y., ... & Noh, S. D. (2016). Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing-green technology, 3(1), 111-128.

[14] Tao, F., Cheng, Y., Zhang, L., & Nee, A. Y. (2017). Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(5), 1079-1094.

[15] Stark, R., Fresemann, C., & Lindow, K. (2019). Development and operation of Digital Twins for technical systems and services. CIRP Annals, 68(1), 129-132.

[16] Duflou, J. R., Sutherland, J. W., Dornfeld, D., Herrmann, C., Jeswiet, J., Kara, S., ... & Kellens, K. (2012). Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach. CIRP annals, 61(2), 587-609.

[17] Monostori, L., Kádár, B., Bauernhansl, T., Kondoh, S., Kumara, S., Reinhart, G., ... & Ueda, K. (2016). Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Cirp Annals, 65(2), 621-641.

[18] Jeon, B. W., Um, J., Yoon, S. C., & Suk-Hwan, S. (2017). An architecture design for a smart manufacturing execution system. Computer-aided design and applications, 14(4), 472-485.

[19] Kern, W., Rusitschka, F., Kopytynski, W., Keckl, S., & Bauernhansl, T. (2015, August). Alternatives to assembly line production in the automotive industry. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on production research (IFPR).

[20] Almada-Lobo, F. (2015). The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES). Journal of innovation management, 3(4), 16-21.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Shah JH. MES-Enabled Cyber-Physical Production Systems: Accelerating Automotive Line Efficiency via Real-Time Decision Frameworks. IJERET [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 30 [cited 2025 Sep. 12];4(2):87-94. Available from: https://ijeret.org/index.php/ijeret/article/view/225