The Regulatory Landscape for Private Wireless Spectrum Allocation across Different Regions

Authors

  • Rahul Bangera Independent Researcher, Ellicott City, MD, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-922X.IJERET-V6I4P119

Keywords:

Private 5G, Spectrum Allocation, CBRS, Local 5G, Campus Networks, Industrial IoT, Telecommunications Policy, 5G NR, Spectrum Sharing, Industry 4.0

Abstract

The global telecommunications landscape is experiencing a fundamental change, driven by the democratization of wireless spectrum access. As Industry 4.0, the Internet of Things (IoT), and mission-critical industrial applications grow, the traditional model of exclusive, nationwide spectrum licensing held by Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) is becoming inadequate to meet the complex needs of "vertical" industries—manufacturing, logistics, healthcare, energy, and utilities. In response, regulators across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific have developed diverse regulatory frameworks to enable Private 5G (P5G) and Private LTE (PLTE) networks. This paper offers a comprehensive comparative analysis of these regulatory systems. It examines the three-tiered dynamic sharing model of the United States’ Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS), Germany’s BNetzA’s administrative "campus network' licensing, the hybrid Shared Access License (SAL) system of the United Kingdom’s Ofcom, and the dedicated "Local 5G" and "e-Um 5G" programs in Japan and South Korea, respectively. By analyzing spectrum bands (especially the differences among bands n78, n77, n79, and n48), licensing economics, device ecosystem maturity, and deployment data, this paper highlights the tension between policy goals and market realities. It concludes that although regulatory approaches vary—from market-driven auctions to nominal administrative fees—the overall trend worldwide is clearly toward localized, enterprise-controlled spectrum

References

[1] Q. Pan and M. K. Marina, "Spectrum regulation for private mobile networks: A global overview," in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN), London, U.K., May 2025, pp. 1–8.

[2] MarketsandMarkets, "Private 5G market by offering, spectrum allocation, frequency band - global forecast to 2030," Market Report, Jun. 2025. [Online]. Available: [https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/private-5g-market-213955658.html].

[3] Federal Communications Commission, "Auction of priority access licenses in the 3550-3650 MHz band; Notice and filing requirements, minimum opening bids, upfront payments, and other procedures for Auction 105," Public Notice, FCC 20-18, Mar. 2020.

[4] CMS Law, "5G regulation and law in South Korea," CMS Expert Guides, 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-5g-regulation-and-law/south-korea].

[5] GSMA, "Private mobile network strategies gain momentum," in Spectrum Policy Trends 2024, London, U.K., Feb. 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://www.gsma.com/connectivity-for-good/spectrum/gsma_resources/spectrum-policy-trends-2024/].

[6] Global mobile Suppliers Association, "5G device ecosystem member report," GSA, London, U.K., Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: [https://gsacom.com/paper/5g-ecosystem-february-2025/].

[7] Ericsson, "5G spectrum for local industrial networks," White Paper, 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/white-papers/5g-spectrum-for-local-industrial-networks].

[8] Digital Regulation Platform, "Spectrum licensing: Local and private networks," Digital Regulation Platform, Nov. 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://digitalregulation.org/spectrum-licensing-local-and-private-networks/].

[9] Ofcom, "Shared access licence: Guidance document," Ofcom, London, U.K., Oct. 2025. [Online]. Available: [https://www.ofcom.org.uk/].

[10] Arcep, "Arcep launches two public consultations on private mobile networks' use of the 3.8 – 4.2 GHz band," Press Release, Paris, France, Jun. 2025. [Online]. Available: [https://en.arcep.fr/news/press-releases/view/n/frequencies-for-commercial-purposes-020625.html].

[11] Federal Communications Commission, "Auction of priority access licenses in the 3550-3650 MHz band closes; Winning bidders announced for Auction 105," Public Notice, DA 20-1009, Sep. 2020. [Online]. Available: [https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-1009A1.pdf].

[12] Federal Communications Commission, "Amendment of the Commission’s rules with regard to commercial operations in the 3550-3650 MHz band," Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 15-47, Apr. 2015. [Online]. Available: [https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-15-47A1.pdf].

[13] U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, "An analysis of aggregate CBRS SAS data from April 2021 to July 2024," Technical Report 25-575, Nov. 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/reports/an-analysis-of-aggregate-cbrs-sas-data-from-april-2021-to-july-2024.pdf].

[14] J. Blackman, "T-Mobile pulls back on CBRS support for neutral-host 5G," RCR Wireless News, Aug. 2025. [Online]. Available: [https://www.rcrwireless.com/20250826/private-5g/t-mobile-neutral-host-cbrs].

[15] Federal Network Agency (BNetzA), "Administrative rules for spectrum assignments for local spectrum usages in the 3700-3800 MHz band," Bundesnetzagentur, Bonn, Germany, Administrative Rules, 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Areas/Telecommunications/Companies/TelecomRegulation/FrequencyManagement/FrequencyAssignment/LocalBroadband3,7GHz.pdf].

[16] N Ofcom, "Statement on making the Wireless Telegraphy (Licence Charges) (Amendment) Regulations 2025," Ofcom, London, U.K., Sep. 2025. [Online]. Available: [https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consultations/category-1-10-weeks/consultation-on-regulations-to-update-the-fees-for-shared-access-licences/main-documents/statement-on-making-the-wireless-telegraphy-regulations-2025.pdf].

[17] Arcep, "Public consultation on the assignment rules and procedures for the 2.6 GHz TDD band," Public Consultation, Paris, France, Jun. 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://en.arcep.fr/news/press-releases/view/n/frequencies-240624.html].

[18] Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, "Guidelines for local 5G implementation," MIC Communications News, vol. 30, no. 4, Dec. 2019. [Online]. Available: [https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_sosiki/joho_tsusin/eng/newsletter/pdf/vol30/no04.pdf].

[19] Global mobile Suppliers Association, "Private mobile networks," GSA, London, U.K., Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: [https://gsacom.com/paper/private-mobile-networks-february-2025/].

[20] Federated Wireless, "Why the U.S. must prioritize the 4 GHz band for 6G," Position Paper, Arlington, VA, USA, Aug. 2025. [Online]. Available: [https://federatedwireless.ai/2025/08/14/why-the-u-s-must-prioritize-the-4-ghz-band-for-6g/].

[21] 5G Alliance for Connected Industries and Automation (5G-ACIA), "Our view on the evolution of 5G towards 6G," White Paper, Frankfurt, Germany, 2024. [Online]. Available: [https://5g-acia.org/whitepapers/our-view-on-the-evolution-of-5g-towards-6g/].

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Bangera R. The Regulatory Landscape for Private Wireless Spectrum Allocation across Different Regions. IJERET [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 25 [cited 2026 Mar. 3];6(4):157-62. Available from: https://ijeret.org/index.php/ijeret/article/view/392