Semantic Automation of Basel III Liquidity Reporting: Utilizing Ontological Knowledge Graphs for Real-Time Regulatory Compliance and Auditability

Authors

  • Anvesh Katipelly Senior Software Engineer, PayPal, Texas, USA. Author
  • Sumith Thalary Sr Cloud DevOps Engineer, Rexel USA, Dallas TX. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-922X.IJERET-V5I2P115

Keywords:

Basel III, Liquidity Reporting, Knowledge Graphs, Ontology, Semantic Automation, Regulatory Compliance, LCR, NSFR, Auditability, Financial Data Analytics

Abstract

The growing complexity of worldwide financial regulations, especially Basel III framework has effectively increased the operation pressure on financial establishments. The liquidity risk management, particularly the adherence to the metrics like the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), requires high-frequency data to be aggregated, semantically consistent, and audited. Conventional reporting designs - which are mostly based on siloed data warehouses and rule-based data transformation pipelines - do not support real-time reporting, do not have semantic interoperability, and have traceability problems. These inadequacies can lead to late reporting, inconsistency in regulatory filings and high compliance costs. The paper suggests a new semantic automation system, which uses ontological knowledge graphs to convert Basel III liquidity reporting into real-time, auditing, and intelligent processes. The framework provides semantic alignment of heterogeneous data sources by embedding domain ontologies in graph-based data models and thereby allows automated reasoning and compliance verification on demand. The proposed architecture is built with ontology-based data ingestion, knowledge graph building, inference engines based on rules, and real-time reporting dashboards. The study outlines the application of ontologies in the modeling of complex financial tasks including liquidity buffers, cash flow mismatches and counterparty risk. The framework supports unified data representation and supports more elaborate querying through the use of semantic web technologies, including RDF (Resource Description Framework), OWL (Web Ontology Language), and SPARQL query processing. Also, all these features are enhanced by the processing of streams so that the liquidity indicators can be updated in almost real time that will guarantee constant monitoring of compliance. One such crucial contribution made by this work is the provision of auditability by provenance tracking and explainable reasoning. All of the reported metrics can be provenanced and their transformation logic can be verified by the regulators and the internal auditors with limited effort. Moreover, automated anomaly detection and predictive analytics are assisted by the graph-based machine-learning method in the system. The implementation outcomes show the accuracy of the reporting, less latency and regulatory transparency. Analytical comparison reveals that the number of mistakes in data reconciliation was greatly decreased and the time of processing was reduced compared to the traditional systems. The framework can also be associated with the current enterprise data strategies such as the cloud-native architecture and big data ecosystems. Conclusively, ontological knowledge graph semantic automation can be considered as a transformative approach to Basel III liquidity reporting. It does not only improve the effectiveness of compliance but also creates a base of smart regulatory ecosystems that can respond to new financial regulations.

References

[1] Chennareddy, R. K. (2020). Engineering Intelligence Systems Using Big Data and Cloud Architectures for Modern Data Intensive Applications. International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, 1(2), 41-50.

[2] Chennareddy, R. K. (2021). Designing Data and Analytics Ecosystems for High Volume Transaction Processing Applications. International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, 2(2), 95-106.

[3] Sethuraman, P., & Chennareddy, R. K. (2022). Machine Learning Assisted Design of Wireless Access Systems for Reliable and Low-Latency Financial and Smart Commerce Services. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning, 3(4), 133-142.

[4] Sethuraman, P., & Chennareddy, R. K. (2022). Intelligent Vehicular Traffic Flow Prediction Using Learning-Based Spatio-Temporal Models for Data-Driven Wireless Transportation and Urban Analytics Systems. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(2), 111-121.

[5] Sethuraman, P. (2022). Latency-Aware Scheduling and Resource Control Algorithms for Emergency and Public Safety Wireless Networks. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(4), 133-140.

[6] Sethuraman, P., & Chennareddy, R. K. (2023). AI-Based Fraud Detection and Prevention at the Radio Access Network: Architectures and Mechanisms for Financial Wireless Service. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning, 4(4), 132-141.

[7] Chennareddy, R. K., & Sethuraman, P. (2023). Enterprise and RAN-Aware Data and Analytics Platforms for Mission-Critical and Low-Latency Digital Services. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(4), 184-192.

[8] Sethuraman, P., & Chennareddy, R. K. (2023). System-Level Design and Orchestration of Large-Scale Cellular Access Networks for Regulatory-Compliant Financial Services. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, 4(3), 140-150.

[9] Chennareddy, R. K. (2023). Enterprise-Scale AI and Analytics Strategy for End-to-End Business Transformation across Global Organizations. International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, 4(3), 134-145.

[10] Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). Web semantic. Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43.

[11] Bizer, C., Heath, T., & Berners-Lee, T. (2023). Linked data-the story so far. In Linking the World’s Information: Essays on Tim Berners-Lee’s Invention of the World Wide Web (pp. 115-143).

[12] Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.

[13] McKinney, W. (2012). Python for data analysis: Data wrangling with Pandas, NumPy, and IPython. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

[14] Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M., d’Amato, C., Melo, G. D., Gutierrez, C., ... & Zimmermann, A. (2021). Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys (Csur), 54(4), 1-37.

[15] World Wide Web Consortium. (2012). OWL 2 web ontology language document overview.

[16] Sadiq, S., & Indulska, M. (2017). Open data: Quality over quantity. International journal of information management, 37(3), 150-154.

[17] Vousinas, G. L. (2015). Supervision of financial institutions: The transition from Basel I to Basel III. A critical appraisal of the newly established regulatory framework. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 23(4), 383-402.

[18] Echenim, K. U., & Joshi, K. P. (2023, December). Iot-reg: A comprehensive knowledge graph for real-time iot data privacy compliance. In 2023 IEEE International conference on big data (BigData) (pp. 2897-2906). IEEE.

[19] Patel, A., & Jain, S. (2021). Present and future of semantic web technologies: a research statement. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 43(5), 413-422.

[20] Ge, Z. (2022). Knowledge graphs and its applications in finance. The future and fintech: ABCDI and Beyond, 155-214.

[21] Barth, M. E., & Schipper, K. (2008). Financial reporting transparency. Journal of accounting, auditing & finance, 23(2), 173-190.

[22] McDaniel, L., Martin, R. D., & Maines, L. A. (2002). Evaluating financial reporting quality: The effects of financial expertise vs. financial literacy. The accounting review, 77(s-1), 139-167.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Katipelly A, Thalary S. Semantic Automation of Basel III Liquidity Reporting: Utilizing Ontological Knowledge Graphs for Real-Time Regulatory Compliance and Auditability. IJERET [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Apr. 15];5(2):147-56. Available from: https://ijeret.org/index.php/ijeret/article/view/535