Cross-Cloud Governance Engine Using Policy-as-Code for CMS Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-922X.IJERET-V3I4P118Keywords:
Cross-Cloud Governance, Policy-As-Code, CMS Platforms, Cloud Security, Automation, Devsecops, Configuration ComplianceAbstract
Modern content management system (CMS) platforms are relying more and more on multi-cloud environments to give users digital experiences that are more scalable, long-lasting & available all over the world. This diversification creates huge problems for governance because traditional rule-based methods often have trouble keeping up with the changing nature of these cloud resources, inconsistent security protocols & the growing complexity of compliance requirements. Manual evaluations, disconnected technologies, and policies that only work in the cloud slow down development cycles as well as create additional risks. This paper presents a Cross-Cloud Governance Engine utilizing a Policy-as-Code (PaC) framework that integrates policy creation, validation & enforcement across several other cloud ecosystems to address current limitations. The engine uses declarative, machine-readable policies to automate security, compliance along with their operational measures. It works perfectly with modern CMS pipelines. It has features like actual time policy assessment, automatic drift detection, and enforcement that works in any other context, which reduces mistakes made by people and makes deployments faster and more consistent. The suggested solution brings together governance logic & uses PaC technologies like OPA/Rego or similar frameworks. This makes sure that these CMS resources on AWS, Azure, GCP, or hybrid configurations follow the rules of the company without getting in the way of development teams. Tests and prototypes show that the engine reduces the burden of governance, makes policies more accurate, speeds up release cycles & makes the platform more reliable overall. This paper explains an organizational structure that is practical, adaptable, and concentrates on developers. It fits with contemporary DevSecOps methods as well as lets businesses effectively manage CMS applications in many other cloud settings while continuing to satisfy strict privacy and compliance criteria.
References
[1] De Leusse, Pierre, and Krzysztof Zielinski. "Toward governance of cross-cloud application deployment." arXiv preprint arXiv: 1203.0432 (2012).
[2] Ahmed, Usama, Imran Raza, and Syed Asad Hussain. "Trust evaluation in cross-cloud federation: Survey and requirement analysis." ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 52.1 (2019): 1-37.
[3] Wang, Huaimin, Peichang Shi, and Yiming Zhang. "Jointcloud: A cross-cloud cooperation architecture for integrated internet service customization." 2017 IEEE 37th international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS). IEEE, 2017.
[4] Raj, Pethuru, and Anupama Raman. "Multi-cloud management: Technologies, tools, and techniques." Software-defined cloud centers: Operational and management technologies and tools. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. 219-240.
[5] Domaschka, Jörg, et al. "Axe: A novel approach for generic, flexible, and comprehensive monitoring and adaptation of cross-cloud applications." European Conference on Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[6] Fortis, Teodor-Florin, and Victor Ion Munteanu. "From cloud management to cloud governance." Continued Rise of the Cloud: Advances and Trends in Cloud Computing. London: Springer London, 2014. 265-287.
[7] Baur, Daniel, et al. "A model driven engineering approach for flexible and distributed monitoring of cross-cloud applications." 2018 IEEE/ACM 11th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC). IEEE, 2018.
[8] Zeginis, Chrysostomos, et al. "Towards cross-layer monitoring of multi-cloud service-based applications." European Conference on Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
[9] Carrasco, Jose, Francisco Durán, and Ernesto Pimentel. "Trans-cloud: CAMP/TOSCA-based bidimensional cross-cloud." Computer Standards & Interfaces 58 (2018): 167-179.
[10] Jinlong, E., et al. "CoCloud: Enabling efficient cross-cloud file collaboration based on inefficient web APIs." IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 29.1 (2017): 56-69.
[11] RAZA, IMRAN, and SYED ASAD HUSSAIN. "Trust Evaluation in Cross-Cloud Federation: Survey and Requirement Analysis." (2018).
[12] Goonasekera, Nuwan, et al. "CloudBridge: A simple cross-cloud python library." Proceedings of the XSEDE16 Conference on Diversity, Big Data, and Science at Scale. 2016.
[13] Carrasco, Jose, et al. "Bidimensional cross-cloud management with TOSCA and Brooklyn." 2016 IEEE 9th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD). IEEE, 2016.
[14] Hou, Fu, and Xinjun Mao. "Cross‐clouds services autonomic management approach based on self‐organizing multi‐agent technology." Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 28.11 (2016): 3213-3237.
[15] Vishnubhatla, Sudhir. "Migrating Legacy Information Management Systems to AWS and GCP: Challenges, Hybrid Strategies, and a Dual-Cloud Readiness Playbook." Hybrid Strategies, and a Dual-Cloud Readiness Playbook (November 20, 2017) (2017).
