An AI-Driven Architecture for Cross-Domain Data Management in Enterprise Systems

Authors

  • Muppidi Sudheer Kumar Data Governance Lead, Kemper, Tallahassee, FL, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-922X.IJERET-V5I2P118

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Cross-Domain Data Management, Enterprise Systems, AI-Driven Architecture, Data Integration, Enterprise Data Governance, Intelligent Data Processing, Distributed Data Management, Machine Learning, Data Interoperability

Abstract

Enterprise ecosystems have undergone an accelerated digital transformation, which has resulted in the exponential creation, fusion and use of multi-domain data, all of which is often heterogeneous. Today's businesses rely on interdependent platforms, such as finance, health care, manufacturing, logistics, cyber security, cloud computing, and intelligent automation. But conventional data management architectures face significant challenges in delivering smooth interoperability, scalability, governance and intelligent decision-making across these distributed spheres. It has become more challenging as cloud-based systems proliferate, microservices architectures grow, Internet of Things (IoT) devices increase, edge computing systems emerge and artificial intelligence (AI) applications become more common. In this context, it becomes critical for enterprises to have the ability to incorporate structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, along with security, compliance, observability, and real-time analytics, into a cross-domain data management architecture. This paper introduces an architecture which leverages AI technologies such as machine learning, metadata intelligence, semantic interoperability, automated governance, and adaptive orchestration mechanisms for cross-domain data management in enterprise systems, all within a single enterprise data ecosystem. The proposed architecture utilizes AI models to enable automation of data discovery, classification, quality, anomaly detection, predictive governance, and policy enforcement in various areas of enterprise. The proposed framework enables dynamic cross domain interoperability with the help of intelligent metadata catalogs, federated learning mechanisms, API orchestration and cloud-native microservices instead of traditional enterprise data warehouses and/or separate data lake solutions. There are four main layers of the architecture: Data Acquisition Layer, Intelligent Processing Layer, Governance and Security Layer, and Enterprise Intelligence Layer. The Data Acquisition Layer facilitates multi-source ingestion from enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, IoT sensors, cloud repositories and external APIs. The Intelligent Processing Layer combines machine learning pipelines, semantic mapping engines, natural language processing models, and graph-based knowledge representation and reasoning methods, allowing for intelligent data harmonization and context-awareness. The Governance and Security Layer combines zero-trust security principles, AI-powered threat intelligence, policy-based access rules, and automatic compliance auditing capabilities to provide enterprise-grade data protection. Lastly, with the Enterprise Intelligence Layer, business stakeholders gain real-time analytics, predictive insights, decision support systems, and adaptive visualization tools. The proposed model also helps overcome enterprise-class data management problems such as data silos, inconsistent metadata standards, latency in distributed systems, security issues, lack of observability, and compliance complexity. The architecture provides intelligent orchestration and automation through AI, which increases operational efficiency, data quality, and faster delivery of analytics and minimizes governance overhead. In addition, the framework also puts into practice principles of explainable AI to guarantee transparency in automated decision making processes, a key element for enterprise trust and regulatory compliance. The analysis was done against traditional centralized architectures, federated data systems and cloud based integration models. The experimental results have shown that the proposed architecture with the integration of AI brings about significant enhancements in interoperability efficiency, data accessibility, governance automation, and analytical responsiveness. The framework proved to be more efficient at data integration by 38%, more accurate on metadata by 41% and more accurate on predictive anomaly detection by 46% than enterprise integration systems. Moreover, automated policy enforcement eliminated the compliance management overhead about 35%. In the study, the use of AI-powered observability and intelligent data catalogs is also noted for their ability to drive operational sustainability and enterprise resilience. The future extensions for the architecture also include emerging technologies like generative AI, federated analytics, autonomous data fabrics, and edge intelligence. The result of this research makes important contributions to enterprise information systems, cloud computing, cyber security governance, and intelligent data engineering. The proposed architecture provides a scalable and flexible platform for future enterprise environments aiming at achieving intelligent, secure, and interoperable data management across domains. The study's theoretical and practical value lies in its development of a holistic AI-powered model that can be used to inform digital businesses in an increasingly complex data-rich environment.

References

[1] Thalary, S., & Katipelly, A. (2023). Secure-by-Design Cloud Software Delivery: How DevOps and Software Teams Co-Own Security Outcomes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning, 4(1), 131-140.

[2] Pemmasani, P. K. (2023). AI in national security: Leveraging machine learning for threat intelligence and response. The Computertech, 1-10.

[3] Thalary, S. (2023). Monitoring Isn’t Observability: Lessons from Running Enterprise Microservices. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, 4(2), 139-148.

[4] Gudepu, B. K., Jaladi, D. S., & Gellago, O. (2023). How Data Catalogs are Transforming Enterprise Data Governance: A Systematic Literature Review. The Metascience, 1(1), 249-264.

[5] Pemmasani, P. K., & Rock, D. (2023). Cloud Storage Security in Government Agencies: Protecting National Data from Cyber Threats. The Metascience, 1(1), 239-248.

[6] Pemmasani, P. K. (2023). National cybersecurity frameworks for critical infrastructure: Lessons from governmental cyber resilience initiatives. International Journal of Acta Informatica, 2(1), 209-218.

[7] Nurse, J. R. C., Axon, L., Erola, A., Agrafiotis, I., Goldsmith, M., & Creese, S. (2020). The data that drives cyber insurance: A study into the underwriting and claims processes. In 2020 International Conference on Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Analytics and Assessment (CyberSA) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSA49311.2020.9139659

[8] Pemmasani, P. K., & Rock, D. (2023). The Impact of Ransomware on Government Agencies: Lessons Learned and Future Strategies. International Journal of Modern Computing, 6(1), 64-74.

[9] Labrinidis, A., & Jagadish, H. V. (2012). Challenges and opportunities with big data. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 5(12), 2032-2033.

[10] Inmon, W. H. (2005). Building the data warehouse. John wiley & sons.

[11] Kimball, R., & Ross, M. (2013). The data warehouse toolkit: The definitive guide to dimensional modeling. John Wiley & Sons.

[12] Newman, S. (2021). Building microservices: designing fine-grained systems. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

[13] Rose, S., Borchert, O., Mitchell, S., & Connelly, S. (2020). Zero trust architecture. NIST special publication, 800(207), 1-52.

[14] Pappas, I. O., Patrick, M., Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & George, L. (2018). Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies. Information systems and ebusiness management, 16(3), 479-491.

[15] Korhonen, J. J., & Halén, M. (2017, July). Enterprise architecture for digital transformation. In 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (Vol. 1, pp. 349-358). IEEE.

[16] Siebel, T. M. (2019). Digital transformation: survive and thrive in an era of mass extinction. RosettaBooks.

[17] Zimmermann, A., Schmidt, R., Sandkuhl, K., Jugel, D., Bogner, J., & Möhring, M. (2018, October). Evolution of enterprise architecture for digital transformation. In 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW) (pp. 87-96). IEEE.

[18] Zhao, Z., & Wang, X. (2021, September). Design and Implementation of Enterprise Public Data Management Platform Based on Artificial Intelligence. In International Conference on Cognitive based Information Processing and Applications (CIPA 2021) Volume 1 (pp. 702-710). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

[19] Dhingra, M., Jain, M., & Jadon, R. S. (2016, December). Role of artificial intelligence in enterprise information security: a review. In 2016 fourth international conference on parallel, distributed and grid computing (PDGC) (pp. 188-191). IEEE.

[20] Engstrom, D. F., Ho, D. E., Sharkey, C. M., & Cuéllar, M. F. (2020). Government by algorithm: Artificial intelligence in federal administrative agencies. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper, (20-54).

[21] Duan, S., Wang, D., Ren, J., Lyu, F., Zhang, Y., Wu, H., & Shen, X. (2022). Distributed artificial intelligence empowered by end-edge-cloud computing: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1), 591-624.

[22] Ionescu, S. A., & Diaconita, V. (2023). Transforming financial decision-making: the interplay of AI, cloud computing and advanced data management technologies. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 18(6).

[23] Seetala, S. R. (2021). Master data management as a strategic foundation for enterprise consistency: Frameworks, architectures, and governance practices. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 4(1), 3230-3240.

[24] Nambiar, A., & Mundra, D. (2022). An overview of data warehouse and data lake in modern enterprise data management. Big data and cognitive computing, 6(4), 132.

[25] Zhu, F., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Zhou, J., Li, L., & Liu, G. (2021). Cross-domain recommendation: challenges, progress, and prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01696.

[26] Badirova, A., Dabbaghi, S., Moghaddam, F. F., Wieder, P., & Yahyapour, R. (2023). A survey on identity and access management for cross-domain dynamic users: issues, solutions, and challenges. IEEE Access, 11, 61660-61679.

[27] Gilbert, J. (2018). Cloud Native Development Patterns and Best Practices: Practical architectural patterns for building modern, distributed cloud-native systems. Packt Publishing Ltd.

[28] Chadwick, D. W., Fan, W., Costantino, G., De Lemos, R., Di Cerbo, F., Herwono, I., ... & Wang, X. S. (2020). A cloud-edge based data security architecture for sharing and analysing cyber threat information. Future generation computer systems, 102, 710-722.

[29] Ahmad, W., Rasool, A., Javed, A. R., Baker, T., & Jalil, Z. (2021). Cyber security in iot-based cloud computing: A comprehensive survey. Electronics, 11(1), 16.

[30] Parvatha, N. (2021). Resilient cybersecurity frameworks for multi-cloud environment: Innovations in securing distributed systems against emerging threats. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 3(1), 266-275.

[31] Anand, A. (2023). AI driven data governance for the enterprise intelligence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4767837.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Sudheer Kumar M. An AI-Driven Architecture for Cross-Domain Data Management in Enterprise Systems. IJERET [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 May 31];5(2):176-87. Available from: https://ijeret.org/index.php/ijeret/article/view/584