Resilient Procurement and Supply Chain Architectures for Managing Disruptions in Volatile and Uncertain Global Markets

Authors

  • Venkata Sathya Kumar Koppisetti Senior SAP Solution Architect. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-922X.IJERET-V7I2P110

Keywords:

Supply Chain Resilience, Procurement Architecture, Risk Management, Global Disruptions, Digital Supply Chains, Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, IoT, Supplier Diversification, Resilience Index

Abstract

The rising rates and intensities of global disruptions, such as pandemics and geopolitical unrest, climate-related incidents and financial unpredictability have revealed some of the most critical vulnerabilities of traditional procurement and supply chain systems. The paper takes an elaborate architecture of developing resilient procurement and supply chain architectures that can survive and adapt to uncertainties in dynamic global markets. The research combines both theoretical knowledge and practical approaches to suggest adaptive, data-driven and decentralized supply chain models. Supply chains have developed to complex and interdependent networks across several countries, suppliers and stakeholders. Globalization has facilitated cost efficiencies and scalability, but has also increased the exposure to systemic risks. COVID-19 pandemic, semiconductor shortages, and geopolitical trade restrictions have disrupted the supply chain and made resilience a fundamental design requirement, not an appendix. In this study, resilience is viewed as the capacity of the supply chains to predict, absorb, adapt, and recover through disruptions and ensure continuation of operations. The article suggests a multi-layered resilience framework that includes strategic sourcing, digital procurement platforms, real-time risk monitoring, and collaborative ecosystems. State of the art technologies (artificial intelligence, blockchain, and Internet of Things (IoT)) are considered in the context of improving visibility, traceability, and decision-making agility. The structure focuses on redundancy, flexibility and supplier diversification as the structural building blocks. A mixed approach of qualitative analysis and quantitative modeling is used. The resilience strategies are assessed using risk assessment models, simulation methods, and performance metrics. The paper presents a resilience index that is determined by the main key performance indicators like recovery time, stability of service level, and cost impact. Findings show that companies with decentralised procurement policies and digitalisation are much more resilient. The results show the disruption response time improvement of up to 35 percent and the supply chain losses reduction of about 28 percent. Moreover, the paper notes the relevance of cross-functional coordination and governance mechanisms in guaranteeing successful implementation. The paper has a contribution to the academic literature and industry practice as it gives a structured approach to resilience design. It provides practical information to policymakers, supply chain managers, and researchers on how to make their way through the challenges of the contemporary global markets. Additional future research directions will involve incorporation of sustainability metrics and investigation of autonomous supply chain systems.

References

[1] Mishra, A., Gupta, N., & Jha, G. K. (2024). Supply chain resilience: Adapting to global disruptions and uncertainty. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering, 5(2), 189-196.

[2] Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N., & Rahman, S. (2015). Supply chain resilience: role of complexities and strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 53(22), 6809-6819.

[3] Ketchen Jr, D. J., Rebarick, W., Hult, G. T. M., & Meyer, D. (2008). Best value supply chains: A key competitive weapon for the 21st century. Business Horizons, 51(3), 235-243.

[4] Saeed, K. A., Malhotra, M. K., & Abdinnour, S. (2019). How supply chain architecture and product architecture impact firm performance: an empirical examination. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 25(1), 40-52.

[5] Christopher, M., & Holweg, M. (2017). Supply chain 2.0 revisited: a framework for managing volatility-induced risk in the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(1), 2-17.

[6] Scholten, K., Stevenson, M., & Van Donk, D. P. (2020). Dealing with the unpredictable: supply chain resilience. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(1), 1-10.

[7] Gaonkar, R. S., & Viswanadham, N. (2007). Analytical framework for the management of risk in supply chains. IEEE Transactions on automation science and engineering, 4(2), 265-273.

[8] Preindl, R., Nikolopoulos, K., & Litsiou, K. (2020, January). Transformation strategies for the supply chain: the impact of industry 4.0 and digital transformation. In Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal (Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 26-34). Taylor & Francis.

[9] Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain.

[10] Sheffi, Y., & Rice Jr, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan management review.

[11] Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), 33-45.

[12] Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: development of a conceptual framework. Journal of business logistics, 31(1), 1-21.

[13] Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2013). The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: a relational view. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 43(4), 300-320.

[14] Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International journal of production research, 58(10), 2904-2915.

[15] Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and operations management, 14(1), 53-68.

[16] Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International journal of production economics, 103(2), 451-488.

[17] Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan management review, 46(1), 53-61.

[18] Ivanov, D. (2021). Supply chain viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies. International journal of production research, 59(12), 3535-3552.

[19] Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International journal of production research, 57(7), 2117-2135.

[20] Queiroz, M. M., & Wamba, S. F. (2019). Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 70-82.

[21] Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Bryde, D. J., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020). Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting. International journal of Production research, 58(11), 3381-3398.

[22] Kache, F., & Seuring, S. (2017). Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. International journal of operations & production management, 37(1), 10-36.

[23] Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature. International journal of production research, 56(1-2), 414-430.

[24] Patidar, A., Sharma, M., Agrawal, R., & Sangwan, K. S. (2023). Supply chain resilience and its key performance indicators: an evaluation under Industry 4.0 and sustainability perspective. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(4), 962-980.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Kumar Koppisetti VS. Resilient Procurement and Supply Chain Architectures for Managing Disruptions in Volatile and Uncertain Global Markets. IJERET [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 16 [cited 2026 Apr. 23];7(2):69-76. Available from: https://ijeret.org/index.php/ijeret/article/view/568