Building Custom Monitoring Scripts for Predictive Failure Detection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-922X.IJERET-V4I1P121Keywords:
Predictive Monitoring, Failure Detection, Automation Scripts, Anomaly Detection, System Reliability, Custom Monitoring Tools, Data-driven MaintenanceAbstract
Developing custom monitoring scripts for predictive failure detection is about creating simple, versatile, and easily deployable solutions that can find equipment failures in advance without the system shutting down. Typically, conventional monitoring systems are obliged to react to problems after the event, whereas this approach focuses on prediction and prevention. By employing tailor-made scripts along with such strategies as statistical modeling, threshold-based anomaly detection, and machine learning algorithms, enterprises are enabled to observe system performance data at all times and thus they can point to the first signs of failure in the system as their reference. This is done to escalate system reliability, execute the minimum of zero unplanned outages, and maximize operational efficiency. The proposed approach includes the development of modular scripts that can be changed for different environments and can be adjusted to different workloads. These scripts can get performance metrics, analyze trends, and even alert based on learned patterns or when there is a deviation from normal behavior. Real-life examples where the identical solutions have been applied demonstrate the decrease in the time that the system is not working as well as the reduction of the costs of maintenance apart from the increase of the continuity of services and the users' satisfaction. In addition to the direct operational advantages, the article presents predictive monitoring as one of the key factors leading to the concept of resilient IT ecosystems by enabling data-driven decision-making and more efficient resource allocation. The paper concludes with the potential that is next for the integration of sophisticated AI models, automated remediation workflows, and self-healing mechanisms resulting in fully autonomous predictive maintenance systems as the follow-up stages.
References
[1] Yang, S. K. "A condition-based failure-prediction and processing-scheme for preventive maintenance." IEEE Transactions on Reliability 52.3 (2003): 373-383.
[2] Chakravorti, Nandini, et al. "Validation of PERFoRM reference architecture demonstrating an application of data mining for predicting machine failure." Procedia CIRP 72 (2018): 1339-1344.
[3] Suryadevara, Siva Sai Krishna. “Knowledge-Graph-Enabled Tagging and Taxonomy Automation Framework”. American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 77-89.
[4] Sotiropoulos, Thodoris, et al. "A model for detecting faults in build specifications." Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages 4.OOPSLA (2020): 1-30.
[5] Katangoori, Sivadeep, and Sushil Deore. "Predictive Drift Detection and Adaptive Reconciliation in Multi-Cloud Data Environments." The Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research 8 (2022): 247-274.
[6] Jangam, Sandeep Kumar, and Nagireddy Karri. "Potential of AI and ML to Enhance Error Detection, Prediction, and Automated Remediation in Batch Processing." International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies 3.4 (2022): 70-81.
[7] Parakala, Adityamallikarjunkumar. "Role Evolution: Developer, Analyst, Lead, Senior." American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology 4.3 (2022): 11-19.
[8] Jiang, Yue, Bojan Cukic, and Tim Menzies. "Fault prediction using early lifecycle data." The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability (ISSRE'07). IEEE, 2007.
[9] Muppaneni, Kavya. “Optimizing React Hooks for Efficient State and Side-Effect Management”. American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 6, Nov. 2022, pp. 44-55.
[10] Quattrocchi, Giovanni, and Damian Andrew Tamburri. "Predictive maintenance of infrastructure code using “fluid” datasets: An exploratory study on Ansible defect proneness." Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 34.11 (2022): e2480.
[11] Muppaneni, Rajarshi Krishna. “From Legacy ERP to Cloud-First: A Transformation Story With Dynamics 365”. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 153-64.
[12] Akinboboye, Oluwatobi, et al. "A risk management framework for early defect detection and resolution in technology development projects." International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation 2.4 (2021): 958-974.
[13] Gaddam, Rohit Reddy. “Cost-Aware Autoscaling for Batch Vs. Online Inference”. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 134-43
[14] Parras, Gloria G., et al. "Neurons along the auditory pathway exhibit a hierarchical organization of prediction error." Nature communications 8.1 (2017): 2148.
[15] Parakala, Adityamallikarjunkumar, and Srinivas Achanta. "Transforming Government Workflows with AI-Driven RPA." International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies 3.4 (2022): 82-92.
[16] Hadžiosmanović, Dina, et al. "Through the eye of the PLC: semantic security monitoring for industrial processes." Proceedings of the 30th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. 2014.
[17] Kumar Doodala, Appala Nooka. “Strategic Migration for JBoss to IIBM WAS: A Framework for Enterprise-Grade Modernization”. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2022, pp. 161-7.
[18] Khadilkar, Aditya, Jun Wang, and Rahul Rai. "Deep learning–based stress prediction for bottom-up SLA 3D printing process." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 102.5 (2019): 2555-2569.
[19] De Benedetti, Massimiliano, et al. "Anomaly detection and predictive maintenance for photovoltaic systems." Neurocomputing 310 (2018): 59-68.
[20] Mo, Hyunho, et al. "Multi-head CNN-LSTM with prediction error analysis for remaining useful life prediction." 2020 27th conference of open innovations association (FRUCT). IEEE, 2020.
[21] Sahal, Radhya, John G. Breslin, and Muhammad Intizar Ali. "Big data and stream processing platforms for Industry 4.0 requirements mapping for a predictive maintenance use case." Journal of manufacturing systems 54 (2020): 138-151.
[22] Debar, Herve, Monique Becker, and Didier Siboni. "A neural network component for an intrusion detection system." S&P. 1992.
[23] Wood, Timothy, et al. "Profiling and modeling resource usage of virtualized applications." ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms and Open Distributed Processing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.